Separation of Powers: Constitutional Plan and Practice
نویسنده
چکیده
The present Article is an attempt to analyze the scheme of Separation of Powers as envisaged under the Indian Constitution and the difficulties faced by the three wings of the government in practice while implementing the provisions of the Constitution in letter and spirit. The author also draws a comparative analysis with the American Constitution scheme of Separation of Powers. Throughout the course of the paper various foreign and Indian cases have been discussed wherein the Courts have recognized that there is no clear straightjacket formula to determine separation of powers. Given the complexity of the democracies all over the world, overlap in jurisdiction is bound to arise. However, each wing of the government must keep an internal check to ensure they do not end up violating the rights of the people. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has recognized that Separation of Powers is a part of the basic structure of the Indian Constitution. It is in this context, that the author felt the need to examine the ‘Constitutional Plan and Practice with respect to Separation of Powers in India’.
منابع مشابه
Historical Gloss , Constitutional Conventions , and the Judicial Separation of Powers
Scholars have increasingly focused on the relevance of post-Founding historical practice to discerning the separation of powers between Congress and the Executive Branch, and the Supreme Court has recently endorsed the relevance of such practice. Much less attention has been paid, however, to the relevance of historical practice to discerning the separation of powers between the political branc...
متن کاملGloss , Constitutional Conventions , and the Judicial Separation of Powers
Scholars have increasingly focused on the relevance of post-Founding historical practice to discern the separation of powers between Congress and the executive branch, and the Supreme Court has recently endorsed the relevance of such practice. Much less attention has been paid, however, to the relevance of historical practice to discerning the separation of powers between the political branches...
متن کاملDiffusion of ideas and comparative law
I. The doctrine of separation of powers As an idea which was ostensibly derived from the domestic constitutional practice of a single state but which has subsequently been adopted as a core constitutional value in many jurisdictions, Montesquieu’s separation of powers theory should be a poster child for the carrying out of constitutional transplants. Widely celebrated and globally diffused, the...
متن کاملCritical analysis of the President's Authorization in the Turkish's 2017 Constitution
From the time that it took political authority in Turkey, the AKP constantly raised the issue of changing Turkey's political system from the parliamentary to the presidential system. Under Erdogan's leadership, after the coup in April 15, 2016, the party was able to reach its goal thanks to the political support of parties and social accompaniment through 2017's referendum. The purpose of this ...
متن کاملThe First Constitution: Rethinking the Origins of Rule of Law and Separation of Powers in Light of Deuteronomy
This Article demonstrates the overlooked contribution of the ancient Near East to the development of constitutional law. The legal corpus of Deuteronomy provides a utopian model for the organization of the state, one that enshrines separation of powers and their systematic subordination to a public legal text—the “Torah”—that delineates their jurisdiction while also ensuring their autonomy. Thi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013